Investigation Finds Calif. Ballot Counting Facility Only Half-Staffed

As vote counting continues at a slow pace across Los Angeles County and much of California, reporters visiting the county’s 144,000-square-foot ballot processing center on Thursday found numerous workstations sitting empty despite a massive backlog of ballots still awaiting review.

The scene raised questions about the pace of ballot processing as election officials work through hundreds of thousands of outstanding votes more than a week after Election Day.

Advertisement

According to figures released by county officials Wednesday night, only 77,521 additional ballots had been processed since the June 2 election.

Yet officials estimated that approximately 713,180 ballots remained outstanding and still needed to be counted, the California Post reported following its investigation of the facility.

Advertisement

However, during The Post’s visit, large portions of the facility’s work stations were empty, while boxes of ballots could be seen everywhere.

“In one area, where ballots that cannot be automatically read by scanners are reviewed by election workers, roughly 25 bins of ballots appeared ready for processing while no employees were seated at nearby desks,” the outlet reported.

Advertisement

“In another section where workers open envelopes and prepare ballots for counting, The Post observed about 75 employees working, despite the area being capable of accommodating more than twice that number,” it said.

President Trump also took aim at California’s slow count with a social media post.

“The Dumocrats are at it again! They are trying to STEAL THE GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA PRIMARY, AND THE MAYOR OF LOS ANGELES, PRIMARY, AWAY FROM TWO GREAT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES. Here we go with the very late and massive numbers of MAIL IN BALLOTS,” he posted on Truth Social.

Trump also said the Justice Department is looking into California’s shady electoral system.

GOP gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton, who was leading Thursday over Democrats Xavier Bacerra and Tom Steyer, said Thursday that he would urge Gov. Gavin Newsom to establish what he called an Emergency Election Count Accelerator Corps to help clear ballot backlogs across the state.

Hilton’s proposal would deploy state personnel and rapid-response teams to counties facing significant delays in processing and tabulating ballots, with the goal of accelerating the certification of election results.

“California is the laughing stock of the nation when it comes to election reporting. We are the fourth-largest economy in the world, home to Silicon Valley and some of the most advanced technology on earth, yet government bureaucrats need a month to count fewer than 10 million ballots,” he said.

Hilton had fallen to third place by Sunday, however, as more ballots came in.

The growing criticism comes despite the massive resources devoted to election administration in Los Angeles County.

County budget documents show that the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk’s Office operates with an annual budget of nearly $336 million and more than 1,100 authorized positions, making it one of the largest local election operations in the nation.

The department is headed by Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Dean Logan, who oversees all county election activities and, according to county records, receives an annual salary of $448,179, The Post reported.

Seeking answers about the pace of ballot processing, The Post submitted a series of questions to the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder’s Office, asking how many employees are currently assigned to counting ballots, whether staffing shortages or vacancies exist, why numerous workstations appeared unoccupied despite the substantial backlog, and whether additional personnel could help speed up the process.

Post reporters also raised those concerns directly while touring the facility. During the visit, a staff member at the election center was asked why rows of ballot-processing stations appeared unused even as hundreds of thousands of ballots remained outstanding.

“The employee told us not to be ‘fooled by what you see,’” The Post continued. “When pressed to elaborate, the staff member offered no further explanation and walked away.”

This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.

Trump Drops Truth Bomb About Jan. 6 That We All Suspected Was True

President Donald Trump confirmed what many had suspected about the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

In a Wednesday interview with Miranda Devine of the New York Post, Trump asserted that federal informants infiltrated the crowd gathered to hear him speak and played a role in inciting the violence that occurred at the Capitol. “Just so you understand, these are people that have been decimated,” he said, referring to those who were railroaded over Jan. 6. “These are people that lost their lives over nonsense, where the FBI said, ‘go in, go in, police, go in, go into the van.’” He added that many Jan. 6 defendants were “were supposed to serve five years, 10 years in jail” and that some died by suicide. “These were many great people,” Trump said. “And I gave them pardons. I’m very proud to have given them pardons. And I think they should be reimbursed for a crooked government.”

 

 WOW! President Trump just EXPOSED the FBI for telling “human sources” to infiltrate January 6th and then WEAPONIZING the DOJ against protestors

“The FBI said, ‘GO IN, GO IN.’ Police, GO IN, and they were supposed to serve five years, ten years in jail. People committed… pic.twitter.com/mdJLoZ8AO6

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 3, 2026

 

After the riot occurred, it was later revealed that approximately 26 confidential human sources working with the FBI were among the protesters demonstrating against the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. These informants were ostensibly present to provide the FBI with information about potential criminal activity. An investigation (of sources) conducted by the Justice Department found that three of the informants had been specifically instructed by the FBI to travel to Washington, D. C. , and monitor certain groups that could pose a problem. The other informants were present to gather information or for personal reasons. But, as legal analyst Julie Kelly pointed out a couple of years ago, the DOJ inspector general’s supposedly clearing of the FBI’s role was political cover wrapped in a technicality. You’ll note the regime media is running with the chum tossed out by DOJ IG Horowitz. Most Americans (and I didn’t until I covered Whitmer fednapping) don’t know that FBI informants are not employees.

Which is why Horowitz added the “no evidence of FBI undercover agents” caveat.

 

You’ll note the regime media is running with the chum tossed out by DOJ IG Horowitz. Most Americans (and I didn’t until I covered Whitmer fednapping) don’t know that FBI informants are not employees.

Which is why Horowitz added the “no evidence of FBI undercover agents” caveat. https://t.co/qB04BPMKSb

— Julie Kelly  (@julie_kelly2) December 13, 2024

 

You’ll note the regime media is running with the chum tossed out by DOJ IG Horowitz. Most Americans (and I didn’t until I covered Whitmer fednapping) don’t know that FBI informants are not employees.

Which is why Horowitz added the “no evidence of FBI undercover agents” caveat. https://t.co/qB04BPMKSb — Julie Kelly ?? (@julie_kelly2) December 13, 2024

Many have claimed that at least some of these informants acted as agitators, inciting the crowd to storm the Capitol building and clash with the police. Video footage reportedly shows informants encouraging people to push into the building. The DOJ’s Inspector General stated that the informants did not promote illegal activities; however, four of them did enter the building without authorization.

 

BREAKING. DOJ INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON JANUARY 6.

Report says 26 confidential human sources (CHS) were in the crowd, but claims there were zero undercover FBI agents.pic.twitter.com/I4Q3tkoQDl

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) December 12, 2024

 

BREAKING. DOJ INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON JANUARY 6.

Report says 26 confidential human sources (CHS) were in the crowd, but claims there were zero undercover FBI agents. pic. twitter. com/I4Q3tkoQDl — Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) December 12, 2024 Former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino has cautioned against painting the entire FBI with a broad brush of corruption. That said, it’s difficult not to view the bureau’s behavior over the past 10 years with suspicion. What agents did to Trump alone is an abomination that really should have led to multiple prison sentences. In a truly just world, that would have happened, and it would have begun with James Comey’s conviction.

“No President Ever Tried This. Trump Just Did — On Live Camera”

The room went silent when he said it. Reporters stared back, some stunned, some already typing, as Donald Trump promised the press was “going to change.”

Not policy. Not war. Them. Their work. Their future. In that moment, the line between criticism and open retaliation snapped —…CONTINUE READING BELOW

and every journalist knew so meth… Continues…

A free press cannot afford to treat that kind of threat as just another outrageous soundbite.

The first response must be radical clarity: explain, relentlessly, to the public why an independent press exists

The first response must be radical clarity: explain, relentlessly, to the public why an independent press exists,

who it protects, and how quickly democracies erode when leaders decide which stories are “allowed.”

Journalists must show their work, tighten standards, correct fast, and then stand even firmer when power pushes back.

The second response is solidarity

The second response is solidarity. Newsrooms that normally compete need to link arms: shared statements,

joint investigations, coordinated legal defenses, and unwavering refusal to accept gag orders,

black listings, or access-for-obedience deals. Press freedom groups,

local outlets, and national giants should act as one ecosystem, not isolated brands

local outlets, and national giants should act as one ecosystem, not isolated brands.

When a president hints the rules will change, the press must answer with a simple, united message:

the Constitution says otherwise — and we’re not moving.

At 18, Barron Trump has finally opened up, confirming long-standing public curiosity about his life and personality. In a rare and candid moment, he addressed speculation that has followed him for years, offering insight into his upbringing, experiences, and future ambitions, while maintaining the privacy that has long defined his public image.

At 18, Barron Trump has stepped into adulthood carrying a lifetime of public attention few ever experience. Born on March 20, 2006, in Manhattan, his name alone placed him under constant scrutiny from the very beginning. Yet behind the headlines, his upbringing followed a far quieter path than many assumed. Guided largely by his mother, Melania Trump, Barron was raised with an emphasis on privacy, discipline, and self-control rather than public exposure.

While his father, Donald Trump, built a career on visibility and boldness, Melania took a different approach with their son. She worked to ensure he experienced as normal a childhood as possible, setting clear boundaries between public life and personal development. Barron’s daily routine centered on school, learning, and personal interests rather than media attention or political involvement. He was rarely seen speaking publicly, and his appearances were limited and carefully managed.

To many observers, Barron’s quiet demeanor was often misinterpreted as distance or detachment. In reality, it reflected a deliberate upbringing that valued restraint and awareness. Growing up in one of the most high-profile families in the world, he learned early how to navigate attention without becoming defined by it. His silence became a form of protection—allowing him to observe rather than react.

During his years in the White House, that protective approach became even more important. Melania consistently reinforced that her son should remain outside political discourse. Barron did not participate in campaigns, speeches, or social media, preserving something rare for someone in his position: the ability to choose his own path.

Now, as he reaches adulthood, those close to him suggest that Barron remains thoughtful and reserved. Rather than embracing the spotlight, he appears focused on making deliberate decisions about his future—whether in business, technology, or another field—guided not by expectation, but by personal choice.

The Reason Donald Trump Never Served in the Military..

President Donald Trump recently reignited debate over his military past after sharing a nostalgic photo from his teenage years at New York Military Academy. The image, posted on Truth Social, shows a young Trump in a military-style uniform standing beside his parents, Fred Trump and Mary Trump. He captioned it simply, “At Military Academy with my parents, Fred and Mary!”—a post that quickly gained attention across social media.

Supporters largely viewed the image as a harmless reflection on his upbringing and early discipline. However, critics tied the post back to Trump’s long-discussed draft record during the Vietnam War. During that era, Trump received five deferments: four related to his studies at Fordham University and Wharton School, and a fifth due to a medical exemption citing bone spurs. While such deferments were common for college students at the time, his case has remained a recurring point of public scrutiny.

Trump has consistently maintained that his deferments were granted legally under existing rules and has described the medical condition as temporary. Still, critics argue that the contrast between his military school background and lack of active service continues to raise questions.

The timing of the post added another layer of discussion, as it appeared amid heightened tensions involving the United States and Iran. Some online reactions even extended to Trump’s son, Barron Trump, and his potential future military obligations. Under current U.S. law, men aged 18 to 25 must register with the Selective Service System, although the draft has not been active since 1973.

Overall, the reaction underscores a familiar divide: supporters emphasize legality and context, while critics focus on symbolism and perceived inconsistencies.

Melania Trump warns of ‘immediate consequences’ following leaked Barron Trump image….#

A recent situation involving Barron Trump has drawn attention after unauthorized photos of him were reportedly taken and shared online. The incident is said to have occurred at Mar-a-Lago, where Barron was accompanying his father, Donald Trump. According to observers, Barron maintained a quiet, low-profile presence, moving through the dining area without engaging with other guests. Despite this, some individuals allegedly took photos without consent and later circulated them on social media, raising concerns about personal boundaries and privacy.

The response from Melania Trump was swift and firm. She reiterated that her son’s privacy is “non-negotiable,” emphasizing that Barron, as a young individual, deserves protection from unwanted public exposure. Reports indicate that she warned of serious consequences for those responsible, including the possibility of being banned from the club. Her reaction reflects a consistent effort over the years to shield Barron from the intense scrutiny often directed at high-profile families.

Management at Mar-a-Lago also supported this stance, reinforcing expectations that members respect the privacy of guests, particularly in settings that are considered private. The incident quickly gained traction online, sparking broader discussions about the ethical implications of photographing individuals—especially minors—without permission, even in semi-public environments.

This episode highlights the ongoing challenge faced by public figures in maintaining personal boundaries in a digital age where moments can easily be captured and shared instantly. While families like the Trumps remain under constant public attention, Melania’s response underscores a clear line between public interest and personal space. Ultimately, the situation serves as a reminder that respect for privacy—especially when it involves young individuals—should take precedence over curiosity or the pursuit of viral content.

SAD NEWS 30 minutes ago in Washington, DC, Donald Trump Was Confirmed as Facing a Defining Moment!

On March 9, 2026, an unusual quiet settled over Washington, D.C., drawing attention to a figure rarely associated with stillness: Donald Trump. For roughly thirty minutes, the usual rhythm of political life—crowds, media noise, and constant motion—seemed to fade. In its place was a calm that stood in sharp contrast to Trump’s long-established, high-energy public style.

Observers noted that the moment, though understated, carried a certain weight. After years defined by campaigns, legal battles, and his time in office, Trump appeared to pause without attempting to shape the narrative. There were no remarks, no gestures toward the press, and no visible effort to command attention. Instead, analysts pointed to a shift in tone, suggesting a rare moment of reflection. It hinted at an awareness that the decisions and actions of his leadership have now moved beyond immediate political impact and into the broader sweep of history.

Such moments of quiet often reveal more than public displays. Trump’s presidency brought lasting changes to American politics, from judicial appointments to significant shifts in economic and foreign policy. Issues once debated intensely in real time are now being reconsidered through a longer historical perspective. The stillness in the capital served as a subtle reminder that while political influence may fade, its consequences often endure.

Unlike many former presidents who gradually step back from public life, Trump has remained highly visible. This made the pause even more striking. In the end, the moment symbolized a transition—from active political force to historical figure—illustrating how even the most dynamic eras eventually give way to reflection, interpretation, and lasting judgment.